Introduction
High school students spend years mastering the complexities of calculus or the details of cell biology, yet topics of personal finance are rarely mentioned in the classroom. This creates almost a strange situation where teenagers are academically prepared for college but remain illiterate regarding the money required to pay for it. Because a formal curriculum is missing, teenagers instead learn about money through the process of financial socialization. This is where they pick up habits and attitudes by observing their parents, listening to their friends, and scrolling through social media. In this environment, financial knowledge is built solely on the social circles they happen to inhibit.
The Absence of Structure
This reliance on social learning is a direct result of the lack of financial education in the school system. While a majority of teens express interest in learning about personal finance, their access to such courses remains limited. A survey by Junior Achievement USA found that 68% of teens reported they would take a finance course if offered, yet only about 31% reported actually having access to one. This gap causes teens to turn to their peers and social media as a primary source of information. This significantly changes the quality of information a student receives.
Amongst teens, information moves through social networks and shapes what people choose to discuss. Within many peer groups, conversations about money tend to revolve around immediate decisions such as spending and basic budgeting. These exchanges do build awareness of cost but can cause topics related to long-term financial growth to be overlooked. Because this learning is social rather than academic, the information a teenager gains is limited to whatever their friends specifically talk about.
The Resulting Gender Gap
It is within this system that a noticeable gap begins to emerge. Research has consistently shown that women demonstrate lower levels of financial literacy than men across age groups. In a large-scale study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research, 38% of men were able to correctly answer basic financial literacy questions compared to just 22% of women. Even more notably, women are significantly more likely to respond with “I don’t know.” This suggests a difference in confidence regarding these topics that starts early in life.
Without formal financial education, the gap may be traced back to the specific types of conversations that take place within peer groups. Amongst many teen girls, conversations do not exceed what something costs, whether it is worth it, and how to manage limited money. Amongst most teen boys, however, conversations are more likely to include topics such as investing, cryptocurrency, or ways to make money. Over time, this difference in conversational exposure can shape familiarity as topics that are regularly discussed become approachable.
What is the solution?
Understanding this dynamic reframes the importance of financial education. While social learning is a natural part of growing up, it becomes a problem when it is one of the only sources of information available. Without a consistent and structured curriculum, students are left to rely on informal networks that do not expose everyone to the same concepts. This way, financial confidence directly becomes tied to specific social circles. Increasing access to financial literacy in schools would help create a fair foundation of knowledge that is currently left entirely to personal exposure.
Sources:
https://www.nber.org/papers/w20793
Image: Dreamstime